[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20 Aug 2003
At 18:20 2003 08 20 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: >| 752632 Color control of CALS table ELEMENT >Reject: We've got attributes like role that could be used for this purpose, > we've got PIs that could be used, and we have HTML tables if you > can support them. There are lots of alternatives that don't involve > changing a supported external standard. > >Accepted. While this is all fresh in our minds, we should be sure we have this recorded unambiguously. I think Norm meant to label the first para I quote above "Proposed" and then put the word "Reject" in the text. Then we Accepted the proposal which was to Reject the request. As the minutes are written, I fear someone might read that and think we Accepted the request. >| 780734 inline code >Straw poll: should we add <code>: > >Jeff Beal Y >Steve Cogorno N >Paul Grosso abstain >Nancy Harrison Y >Dick Hamilton N >Scott Hudson Y >Michael Smith Y >Norman Walsh abstain For the record, I would have voted Y to adding <code>. >Norm: Would anyone object to adding code? > >None. > >Proposal: Add a code element. > >Accepted.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]