Subject: Re: [docbook] Policy on backwards incompatible changes
Norman Walsh wrote: > * A point release (X.1,X.2,X.1.2, etc.) MUST NOT contain any backwards > incompatible changes. > > * A major release MAY contain backwards incompatible changes if both > of the following conditions are true: > > - The change was announced in the release notes for the previous > version (major or minor) > > - The change was announced in a release that occurred at least six > months previously. That looks good, I suggest we add a condition that is to provide along with the backwards incompatible release a stylesheet able to convert legacy documents to newer schema. I know it might be delicate in some cases, but that could be a start for anyone. Cheers, Camille.
begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Camille B=C3=A9gnis n;quoted-printable:B=C3=A9gnis;Camille org:NeoDoc adr:;;139 rue Philippe de Girard;Pertuis;;84120;France email;internet:email@example.com tel;work:+126.96.36.199.99.55 tel;fax:+188.8.131.52.99.55 tel;cell:+184.108.40.206.10.23 url:http://www.neodoc.biz version:2.1 end:vcard