Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook - a success story?
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 18:02 +0100 schrieb wolfgang haefelinger: [..] > 2. DocBook is probably also fine to create (X)HTML. I did not give it > a try cause I consider generating HTML obsolete cause most web content > is generated nowadays by using some simle markup languages And (X)HTML is not a "simple markup language"? What is simpler than this? > 3. Rendering my CV as man page would have been fun That is a silly idea. Do you really know, what a manual page is and what it looks like? I would really love to know, what would be in your NAME, SYNOPSIS and OPTIONS sections. In AUTHORS you would put your parents and in COPYRIGHT your wife? :) > but it did not work > cause I'm using the "wrong" docbook format (i.e. "article"). There a > lot of tools which claim to render a DocBook source into a man page. > They all only render a subset of DocBook only .. Of course. Why do you expect that article == book == refentry? If all would have the same meaning, we wouldn't need all of them. <refentry> fits best to the manual page contents and its format. > 4. I wrote my own "DocBook to Plain text" XSLT stylesheet in a couple > of hours work. JFTR: It's much easier to dump the output of a HTML/PD/PS browser/viewer into a text file. PS: You have already been pointed to the xmlresume software, which is probably what you are looking for. Regards, Daniel