Re: [docbook] Re: XInclude 1.1 Requirements

[Camille Bégnis <camille@neodoc.biz>]

Hello,

I read it carefully and hope I understood it. It looks to be able to solve many issues indeed, those we fight daily.
If I understand correctly solving the duplicate IDs issue for example would be delegated to the processor though.
How much likely processor developers will be to support all of this? Hearing their feedback would be particularly interesting.

Thanks for this work.

Camille Bégnis

Gérant

camille@neodoc.fr

Tél: +33(0)9.54.96.99.55 - Fax: +33(0)9.59.96.99.55

http://www.neodoc.fr/

5, rue de la Touloubre
13770 Venelles
France

On 02/04/2012 19:41, Norman Walsh wrote:

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:

In the course of trying to work out how best to address transclusion requirements
for DocBook, some of us concluded that we should try to push this feature further
up the stack. We've got concrete evidence of progress now:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xinclude-11-requirements-20120214/

It would be very useful to get some review of these requirements.
Naturally, we want to know about any cases where you think the
proposal is inadequate, but in terms of judging interest it would be
valuable to hear just that you read it, care, and think it sounds
good.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm