Subject: Re: [docbook] Article in Set not Allowed: Why?
Hi Bob, On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:48:21 -0700 "Bob Stayton" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I think up to now putting a collection of articles in a book was > considered sufficient. Originally, set was defined as a container > for multiple books so that xrefs between books could be validated, > since such links have to be in the same document (ID/IDREF). More > recently, someone submitted an RFE and made the case for allowing > nested sets, supplying a use case that made sense to the DocBook TC. > If you want set to contain article, you could file an RFE on the > DocBook SourceForge site and present your case. The TC considers all > RFEs that are submitted. Thanks Bob, for your suggestion. I've submitted a RFE ("Allow Article in Set"). You can find it here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3571149&group_id=21935&atid=384107 -- Gruß/Regards, Thomas Schraitle