Re: [docbook] Allow <info> as root element?

[Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de>]

Hi,

On 01.12.22 08:41, Dave Pawson wrote:
> [...]
>
> Rather contrasting? You're not prepared to alter your schemas, your validation
> nor your stylesheets, yet you ask the group to alter docbook to suite
> your needs?

Maybe you misunderstood my intention or I phrased it badly. I just showed some
issues with the current DocBook schema. Others agreed and have the same.

I can live with it if <info> isn't part of the list of start elements. I'm able
to circumvent this if this is the way to go. :)

What I'm trying to say is, maybe some of the design decision that was good when
DocBook was created years ago should be reviewed in the light of the more
modern topic-oriented approach. Maybe we can all learn from each others. That's
all.

--
GruÃ/Regards
  Thomas Schraitle