Re: interoperability concerns: schema

[Christine Tomlinson <chris.tomlinson@sun.com>]

As your comments are in the form of a 'Best Practice' they seem prudent.

It is reasonable that DSML v2 establish a category of spec appendices or
separate documents that are non-normative and represent a 'Best Practices' form
of communication.

ciao,
Christine Tomlinson
Sun/iPlanet

John McGarvey wrote:

> At the face-to-face, I suggested that DSML v2 might address a small class
> of interoperability concerns.  The two that I mentioned were LDAP schema
> differences and namespace differences.
>
> After some reflection on the LDAP schema question, I suggest only the
> following amendment:
>
> When storing or querying information about a user, if the information is
> included in the inetOrgPerson object class as defined by RFC 2798, a DSML
> v2 application SHOULD use the inetOrgPerson class.  A DSML v2 application
> SHOULD use the object classes and attribute types defined by RFC 2256 to
> store or query information associated with the object classes and attribute
> types documented in that RFC.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: dsml-request@lists.oasis-open.org