[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dss-x] Which XSD version to use for the "Comprehensive Multi-Signature Verification Reports" profile?
Am 19.09.12 20:35, schrieb Cornelis Frank:
mmm... didn't know that there was a cd02. I'm still using cd1 in the eID DSS: http://code.google.com/p/eid-dss/source/browse/trunk/eid-dss-ws/src/main/resources/oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd1.xsd but as cd02 is only adding a few elements, cd1 should be compatible with cd02 right?
but when you validate the one Ernst Jan named harvested as *cd02.xsd you receive teh notification, that the SAMLv1 reference is not resolved:
<import namespace="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:assertion" schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3408/oasis-sstc-saml-schema-protocol-1.1.xsd"; />Argh, persistence is not allways machine-readable (since the document moved and the notice is per html and not of course per "W3C Schema language" :-)
Upon resolving the URL you receive (vie curl -O, not the browser, which follows silently ...):
Cite " <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>301 Moved Permanently</title> </head><body> <h1>Moved Permanently</h1><p>The document has moved <a href="https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3408/oasis-sstc-saml-schema-protocol-1.1.xsd";>here</a>.</p>
<hr><address>Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_jk/1.2.26 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Server at www.oasis-open.org Port 80</address>
</body></html> "Ok, whatever, I think we should update the URL inside the schema CD03 at least as a CD03 or so to "https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3408/oasis-sstc-saml-schema-protocol-1.1.xsd";
I think SAML committee update version 1.0 to version 1.1 and effectively dumped the 1.0 by a redirect. I wonder, if we are the first to notice, but I guess not.
All the bets, Stefan.
________________________________________
Van: dss-x@lists.oasis-open.org [dss-x@lists.oasis-open.org] namens Ernst Jan van Nigtevecht [EJvN@Sonnenglanz.net]
Verzonden: woensdag 19 september 2012 15:19
Aan: dss-x@lists.oasis-open.org
Onderwerp: [dss-x] Which XSD version to use for the "Comprehensive Multi-Signature Verification Reports" profile?
The document of the "Comprehensive Multi-Signature Verification Reports" profile refers to an XSD, as follows:
[DSSVR-XSD] D. Hühnlein, I. Henkel, J. C. Cruellas, S. Drees, A. Kuehne, et. al.: “DSS Verification Report Schema”, July 2009 http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33059/VerificationReport-CD1.xsd
The comment within that XSD states:
Version corresponding to CD1, 2009-06-24
But there is a newer version available if we look into:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/profiles/verificationreport/
oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd1.xsd<http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/profiles/verificationreport/oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd1.xsd> 31-Jul-2009 09:02 27k
oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd02.xsd<http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/profiles/verificationreport/oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd02.xsd> 04-Nov-2010 12:26
At the website another XSD is referenced:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/profiles/verificationreport/oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd1.xsd
Which is not the same as the VerificationReport-CD1.xsd
Summary:
1) Website refers to: oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd1.xsd ("Version corresponding to CD1, 2009-07-19 "), 31-Jul-2009
2) Document (CS1) refers to: VerificationReport-CD1.xsd ("Version corresponding to CD1, 2009-06-24"),
3) Folder contains oasis-dssx-1.0-profiles-vr-cd02.xsd ("Version corresponding to CS1, 2010-09-27"), 4-Nov-2010
The target namespace used by the website XSD contains "dss-x", which is not the case for the XSD reference by the document.
The other differences between 1 and 2 are only related to formatting.
The main difference between 1 and 3 is the introduction of
1: <element name="TSLValidity" type="vr:TrustStatusListValidityType" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0"/>
3: <element name="TSLValidity" type="dss:AnyType" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0"/>
==> Which XSD should be the reference XSD?
I would say the one from 4 nov 2010. But that one is not referenced by the documentation in the CS from nov 2010 nor by the website...
Regards
Ernst Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dss-x-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dss-x-help@lists.oasis-open.org
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]