Re: Final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 signature validation protocol FOR APPROVAL

[Andreas Kuehne <kuehne@trustable.de>]

Hi validation enthusiasts!

Thank you very much for the inclusion of the lengthy list of the
previous review remarks of the DSS-X TC!

This time the remarks are included as comments in the Word document.

Greetings,

Andreas
(on behalf of the OASIS DSS-X TC)
> Hallo Andrea, Sonia, Juan Carlos, all,
>
> first of all a happy, healthy, great, â, successful 2019!
>
> Thank you for your mails, the schema and the cleaned document. 
>
> I had uploaded my comments to the draft of TS 119 442 (V0.0.12) this morning in two contributions (see attachment)
> 1)	https://docbox.etsi.org/ESI/ESI/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2019//ESI(19)000001a1_Discussion_Points_for_Draft_of_TS_119_442__V0_0_12_.doc is 
> a list with 13 discussion points, which should be discussed in a separate meeting before finalisation. This 
> list contains the points, which I more or less consider as essential deficiencies, which shall be fixed before publication. 
> The term âfinal draftâ is probably a little optimistic and flattering for this V0.0.12. ð
> 2)	https://docbox.etsi.org/ESI/ESI/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2019//ESI(19)000001_Comments_within_cleaned_Draft_of_TS_119_442__V0_0_12_.docx is 
> the cleaned up document version with technical and also editorial comments. These comments should be considered during producing
> V0.0.13, which should reflect the outcome of the meeting for the discussion of the first document and, if possible, enter another remote consensus round. 
> This version still contained the old comments, as I was not sure, whether they have been resolved or not.
>
> Please let me know, when it would be convenient for you to discuss the 13 discussion points. 
>
> Best regards,
>     Detlef 
>
> -----UrsprÃngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu> 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2019 17:07
> An: Andrea Rock <andrea.rock@universign.com>; detlef.huehnlein@ecsec.de; 'Sonia Compans' <Sonia.Compans@etsi.org>; 'Sylvie Lacroix_Internet' <sylvie.lacroix@sealed.be>
> Cc: 'Andreas Kuehne*' <kuehne@trustable.de>; STF524_ESI_Valid <STF524_ESI_VALID@LIST.ETSI.ORG>
> Betreff: Re: AW: Final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 signature validation protocol FOR APPROVAL
>
> Dear all,
>
> First of all, I wish you all the best for this new Year.
>
> As for the XML schema, the actual truth is that I am out of Barcelona (the UPC closes its premises until 7th January), have no access to my computer in the office, and consequently I am not able to say whether the version that Andrea has submitted to you is the latest one or not. 
> But taking into account that the date of the document that she has distributed is 9/11th and the date when I uploaded the word document for remote consensus was 4/12 it could happen that it is not the latest one...although it could be one very close to it....
>
> In summary, I can not ensure that the document distributed by Andrea contains the last xml schema.
>
> On Monday 7th I will upload the latest version to the sharepoint of the STF and to the ESI portal so that everybody has access to it.
>
> On the other hand, what I can tell is that I checked several times that the XML schema pieces appearing in the word document distributed by Sonia are the same as in the XML schema file.
>
> One more thing: until 7th January I will have quite limited access to
> Internet: this is the reason why I did not react before.
>
> Best regards
> Juan Carlos.
>
> El 2/1/19 a las 11:51, Andrea Rock escribiÃ:
>> Dear Detlef,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply and happy new year :)
>>
>> I don't really know what went wrong with the clean version.
>>
>> Probably it is already to late, but I send you the latest XML scheme 
>> that I could find. I hope this is the latest (from November 9th).
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> 	<http://www.universign.com>
>> 	
>>
>> 	
>> 	
>> *Andrea Rock*
>> *R&D Engineer & Standardisation Expert*
>> +33 (0)1 44 08 73 03 <tel:+33144087303>  | +33 6 61 47 21 41
>> <tel:+33661472141>
>> andrea.rock@universign.com <mailto:andrea.rock@universign.com>
>> www.universign.com <http://www.universign.com/> @Universign 
>> <http://twitter.com/Universign/> Universign 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/89114/>
>>
>> 	
>>
>> Le 12/24/2018 Ã 12:21 PM, detlef.huehnlein@ecsec.de a Ãcrit :
>>> Hallo Sonia, Juan-Carlos, Sylvie, Andrea,
>>>
>>> I just found a short slot to take a quick look at the final (?) draft 
>>> of TS 119 442 for approval and it
>>>
>>> seems that both word documents (i.e. also the â-clean) in the package 
>>> below contain quite a few revision marks
>>>
>>> and STF-internal comments and both documents seem to be more or less 
>>> identical.
>>>
>>> Is there a âcleanerâ document, which is meant to form the basis for 
>>> final comments, or
>>>
>>> should we just take one of the documents, accept revision marks and 
>>> ignore or delete the
>>>
>>> STF-internal comments?
>>>
>>> Furthermore, it would be helpful to get the XML- and JSON-schema, 
>>> which is referenced in Annex A,
>>>
>>> but it does not seem to be included in the package.
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>> Best regards and a very merry and peaceful christmas,
>>>
>>>       Detlef
>>>
>>> *Von:*detlef.huehnlein@ecsec.de <detlef.huehnlein@ecsec.de>
>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2018 16:48
>>> *An:* 'Sonia Compans' <Sonia.Compans@etsi.org>; 'Andreas Kuehne*' 
>>> <kuehne@trustable.de>
>>> *Cc:* 'Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz_Internet' <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>; 
>>> 'Sylvie Lacroix_Internet' <sylvie.lacroix@sealed.be>
>>> *Betreff:* AW: Final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 signature validation 
>>> protocol FOR APPROVAL
>>>
>>> Hi Sonia,
>>>
>>> thanks. Iâll try to have a look at it asap.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>>   dh
>>>
>>> *Von:*Sonia Compans <Sonia.Compans@etsi.org 
>>> <mailto:Sonia.Compans@etsi.org>>
>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2018 16:45
>>> *An:* Andreas Kuehne* <kuehne@trustable.de 
>>> <mailto:kuehne@trustable.de>>; detlef.huehnlein@ECSEC.DE 
>>> <mailto:detlef.huehnlein@ECSEC.DE>
>>> *Cc:* Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz_Internet <cruellas@ac.upc.edu 
>>> <mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.edu>>; Sylvie Lacroix_Internet 
>>> <sylvie.lacroix@sealed.be <mailto:sylvie.lacroix@sealed.be>>
>>> *Betreff:* FW: Final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 signature validation 
>>> protocol FOR APPROVAL
>>>
>>> Dear Andreas and Detlef,
>>>
>>> This email is in particular for you as it would be good if you could 
>>> review the final draft and provide comments, especially with the aim 
>>> to be aligned with the coming OASIS DSSX v2.0 CSD02.
>>>
>>> Andreas, if you donât how to post comments on the remote consensus 
>>> tool, you can send them to me and I will post them on your behalf.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Sonia
>>>
>>> *Sonia Compans****â*Technical Officer
>>>
>>> *ETSI*â www.etsi.org <http://www.etsi.org>âsonia.compans@etsi.org
>>> <mailto:sonia.compans@etsi.org>
>>>
>>> Phone: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 36 âMobile: +33 (0)6 67 15 58 49
>>>
>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for 
>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender 
>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software. Thank 
>>> you for your co-operation.
>>>
>>> *From:*Sonia Compans
>>> *Sent:* 04 December 2018 4:42 PM
>>> *To:* ESI <ESI@list.etsi.org <mailto:ESI@list.etsi.org>>; 
>>> ESI_SIG_CREA_VALID_TSP_SG <ESI_SIG_CREA_VALID_TSP_SG@list.etsi.org
>>> <mailto:ESI_SIG_CREA_VALID_TSP_SG@list.etsi.org>>
>>> *Subject:* Final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 signature validation 
>>> protocol FOR APPROVAL
>>>
>>> Dear ESI and remote signature creation/validation steering group,
>>>
>>> STF 524 prepared the final draft TS 119 442 v0.0.12 âProtocol for 
>>> TSPs providing signature validation servicesâ.
>>>
>>> It is now for TB approval before publication.
>>>
>>> The approval will formally start tomorrow at noon until 2 January.
>>>
>>> I invite everyone to make a deep review of the final draft and to
>>> submit your comments as soon as possible through the remote consensus 
>>> tool.
>>>
>>> https://docbox.etsi.org/ESI/ESI/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2018/ESI(18)000225_F
>>> inal_Draft_TS_119_442_v0_0_12_Protocol_for_TSPs_providing_s.zip
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Sonia
>>>
>>> *Sonia Compans****â*Technical Officer
>>>
>>> *ETSI*â www.etsi.org <http://www.etsi.org>âsonia.compans@etsi.org
>>> <mailto:sonia.compans@etsi.org>
>>>
>>> Phone: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 36 âMobile: +33 (0)6 67 15 58 49
>>>
>>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended for 
>>> the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be unlawful.
>>> If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender 
>>> immediately by using the reply facility in your email software. Thank 
>>> you for your co-operation.
>>>

-- 
Andreas KÃhne 
phone: +49 177 293 24 97 
mailto: kuehne@trustable.de

Trustable Ltd. Niederlassung Deutschland Gartenheimstr. 39C - 30659 Hannover Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 212612

Director Andreas KÃhne

Company UK Company No: 5218868 Registered in England and Wales

Attachment: ESI-0019442v0012-clean_ak.docx
Description: Binary data