Re: XML Schema for DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01

Hi Andreas and all (omitting ETSI recipient for this message),

(Chet is on holiday today, so I'll respond...)

I think there are two key points here:

1) To initiate the publication, the TC must submit the publication request form atÂhttps://www.oasis-open.org/resources/tc-admin-requests/15-day-committee-specification-draft-public-review-request.Â

- Since the TC's email ballot specified 30 day Public Review instead of the possible 15-day review, please also note this on the request form.Â

- Also, I should note that the email ballot cannot be considered completed or closed until February 8, since the OASIS TC Process [1] requires that electronic ballots be open for at least 7 days. You may go ahead and submit the publication request now, however.Â

- For the "approval link", please use the email message summarizing the voting - I think it would beÂhttps://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-x/201902/msg00005.html.Â

- Also, if you have not already done this, you will need to prepare a summary or log of the handling of all comments on the previous Public Review (csprd01), and provide a link to this document when you submit the publication request form. The log file will be placed into the directory with the csprd01 files, similar to the TC's previous Public Review for other documents (for example, see [2]).

2) Regarding replacing or correcting the XML schema file for csprd01, that is not allowed [3]. Published documents may not be altered - the change will need to be included in the next stage (csprd02).

[1]Âhttps://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process-2017-05-26#voting

[2] previous comment resolution logs:

Â Âhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/localsig/v1.0/csprd01/localsig-v1.0-csprd01-comment-resolution-log.doc

Â Âhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/localsig/v1.0/csprd01/localsig-v1.0-csprd01-comment-resolution-log.xls

[3] Resource permanence:Â http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html#resourcePermanence

Best regards,

Paul

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 4:56 AM Andreas Kuehne <kuehne@trustable.de> wrote:

Hi Chet, hi Paul,

the ETSI task forces waiting for our DSS-X core 2.0 CD 02 to become
available asked us for the state of the new version (see email below).
What's the current status for the committee draft uploaded at

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss-x/download.php/64644/dss-core-v2.0-wd11-package-for-CSD02-PRD02.zip

? Can the TC support in any way?

Greetings,

Andreas

> Dear Andreas,
>
> As you willÂ know, ESI is going to approve and publish the ETSI TS 119
> 442v1.1.1, which is based on DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01.
>
> ETSI is also going to publish the XML schema. Obviously, this XML
> Schema is going to import types and elements from the XML Schema of
> DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01.
>
> You will remember that at that ML Schema of DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01,
> the definitions of OptionalIntpus and OptionalOutputs did not allow to
> have more than one optional input/optional output. As far as I am
> aware, and from what I have seen, these issues have been fixed in the
> XML Schema of DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD02.
>
> However, at this point in time, is too premature to refer to DSS-X
> core v2.0 CS CD02.
>
> Could it be possible for the DSS-X to fix this aspect in the XML
> Schema of DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01, so that implementers would not get
> stuck by this bug? Could it also be possible to leave the fixed XML
> Schema of DSS-X core v2.0 CS CD01 at the same URL as the original one,
> so that we can include the corresponding <xs:import> at the TS 119 442
> XML Schema right away? If not, could you please let us know the new URL?
>
>
> Thank you very much indeed for your kind help
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Juan Carlsos
>
>

--
Andreas KÃhne
phone: +49 177 293 24 97
mailto: kuehne@trustable.de

Trustable Ltd. Niederlassung Deutschland Gartenheimstr. 39C - 30659 Hannover Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 212612

Director Andreas KÃhne

Company UK Company No: 5218868 Registered in England and Wales

dss-x message