OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [dss] Observations on TST


fine - Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Moses [mailto:tim.moses@entrust.com]
> Sent: 18 August 2003 21:41
> To: 'Trevor Perrin'; Nick Pope; 'DSS'
> Subject: RE: [dss] Observations on TST
>
>
> Colleagues - I'll work on a revision of the Timestamp token specification.
> Specifically ...
>
> 1. Import and use the ds:Signature element definition.
> 2. Introduce an optional Issuer element.
> 3. Leave the Accuracy and Ordered elements as they are until we have
> completed further discussion and come to a conclusion.
> 4. Leave out the nonce for now.  The issuer/serial will serve to uniquely
> identify the token.  We can easily add it back, should we subsequently
> decide we need it.
>
> All the best.  Tim.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trevor Perrin [mailto:trevp@trevp.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:57 PM
> To: Nick Pope; 'DSS'
> Subject: RE: [dss] Observations on TST
>
>
> At 09:32 AM 8/15/2003 +0100, Nick Pope wrote:
> > > Trevor wrote:
> > > One thing that worries me about the Accuracy field, as in RFC
> > > 3161 and the
> > > Entrust proposal, is that the client has to add and subtract the
> Accuracy
> > > field with the timestamp time to determine the upper and lower bounds.
> > >
> > > Isn't this non-trivial?  The client might have to know how many
> > > days are in
> > > each month, leap-years, leap-seconds, that sort of thing.
> > >
> > > Would it be easier for the server to explicitly return an upper and
> lower
> > > bound, instead of an Accuracy?
> > >
> >
> >I am not expecting that the upper and lower bounds is the main
> interest.  I
> >see accuracy as a quality indicator.  Changing to upper and lower bounds
> >make it much more difficult to decide whether the time-stamp is accurate
> >enough for my purposes.
>
> That's true.  I wonder if there's anyone with experience using
> RFC 3161 who
> can tell us how useful Accuracy is, and what it's most commonly used for.
>
> Trevor
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
kgroup.php





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]