RE: [dss] v2 timestamp token

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

Tim,

What is the significance of using "errorBound" rather than "accuracy" as in
RFC 3161?  Is there any difference to how I should handle an RFC 3161
time-stamp from the XML time-stamp?

Do we want to define a more general outer structure for time-stamp which
includes the choice between an RFC 3161 time-stamp, XML timestamp or some
other syntax?

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Moses [mailto:tim.moses@entrust.com]
> Sent: 27 August 2003 16:03
> To: 'DSS'
> Subject: [dss] v2 timestamp token
>
>
> Colleagues - Here is draft 2 of the timestamp token specification.  Main
> changes ...
>
> 1. implemented the naming proposal.
> 2. more use of attributes (instead of elements).
> 3. changed "accuracy" to "errorBound".
> 4. added a verification procedure.
> 5. updated the example.
>
> All the best.  Tim.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tim Moses
> 613.270.3183
>
>