RE: [dss] plans for next draft

[Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>]

At 10:29 PM 11/18/2003 -0500, Edward Shallow wrote:


>Number 4) below sounds good, but if you are going for extensibility why not
>further reduce ContentTimestamp and SignatureTimestamp to simply Timestamp

Good idea.


>defaulting to Signature Timestamp. Examples of flat Timestamp types:
>Content, Signature, SigAndRefs, RefsOnly, DataObjects, Archive.

Should we provide URIs for these, in the core spec?

I wouldn't mind omitting them, for now, and letting profiles define the 
URIs they need.  And then later on, we can decide if we want to refactor 
some into the core.

Trevor