RE: [dss] DSS, ebXMLRegistry Joint Proposal for e-Gov Services

[John Messing <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

I think the proposal is extremely useful. I noted what I thought was a
typo on page two: "by any mechanism that is fit for purposed", and I
strongly believe that the term e-notary has no place in the document
because there is no in-person authentication of a submitter and thus
the term "e-notary" is a misnomer that is likely to cause confusion in
a legal context and with regard to the work of the eNotary TC of
LegalXML-OASIS. I recommend removing it.

John Messing
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [dss] DSS, ebXMLRegistry Joint Proposal for e-Gov Services
> From: "Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>
> Date: Fri, July 23, 2004 7:26 am
> To: dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> Please peruse the attached discussion document which outlines the DSS,
> ebXMLRegistry Joint Proposal for e-Gov Services.
> I plan to present it at the e-Government TC F2F on Tuesday 27 July.
> The ebXMLregistry Tc ok'd the initial draft yesterday.
> Given time we could discuss it on the monday conference call.
> 
> cheers
> carl
> 
> -- 
> Carl Mattocks
> 
> co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
> co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC
> CEO CHECKMi
> v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
> www.CHECKMi.com
> Semantically Smart Compendiums
> (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi