RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

I agree with ed it does not follow the basic semanics of verify.

Nick 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.es]
> Sent: 29 July 2004 12:11
> To: Nick Pope; John Ross; 'OASIS DSS TC'
> Subject: RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping
> 
> 
> Nick,
> 
> >Thinking further is my requirement best met througha signature policy
> >identifier that applies well defined rules that includes archive 
> time-stamps
> >only being applied if the signature is valid?
> >
> >Nick
> 
> Yes, it is, but I still would like to know your opinion on leaving the
> UpdateWithoutVerify
> option even with what you propose. Have you read Ed's message? 
> 
> Juan Carlos.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
> roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
> kgroup.php.
> 
> 
>