dss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping

From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz <cruellas@ac.upc.es>
To: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>, "John Ross" <Ross@secstan.com>, "'OASIS DSS TC'" <dss@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:10:42 +0200

Nick,

>Thinking further is my requirement best met througha signature policy
>identifier that applies well defined rules that includes archive time-stamps
>only being applied if the signature is valid?
>
>Nick

Yes, it is, but I still would like to know your opinion on leaving the
UpdateWithoutVerify
option even with what you propose. Have you read Ed's message? 

Juan Carlos.
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping
  - From: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>

References:
- RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping
  - From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz <cruellas@ac.upc.es>
- RE: [dss] Validation semantics of time-stamping
  - From: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]