RE: [dss] Re: Emailing: comentarios-perfil-epm-with-comments.rtf

["Edward Shallow" <ed.shallow@rogers.com>]

Juan-Carlos,

    Thanks for this detailed point, counter-point. I think I can clarify
most of the questions since they are all inter-related. The other goods news
is that you have now convinced me to refer to the XAdES profile for the
signature timestamp. I will take up this suggestion. However, I am not sure
exactly how I should actually ref and import your schema. Do you have an
.xsd yet ?

    Lastly we share the same concern with respect to passing in signatures
to be timestamped in the Sign protocol. See other threads on the list. I
assumed we all agreed that ReturnUpdatedSignature on the Verify when in fact
we are not even doing a Verify is too fundamentally inconsistent and is a
semantic mortal sin. I also assumed that we had consensus on performing
timestamps of existing signatures on the back of the Sign protocol. Correct
?

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Carlos Cruellas [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.es] 
Sent: September 15, 2004 10:58 AM
To: ed.shallow@rogers.com; 'OASIS DSS TC'
Subject: [dss] Re: Emailing: comentarios-perfil-epm-with-comments.rtf

Dear Ed,

Sorry for the late reaction... it takes time to re-start things after
holidays....
Anyway, below follow my reactions to your reply.
Thanks

Juan Carlos.