Yes that is good Nick.
Cheers,
Ed
----- Original Message ----
From: Nick Pope
<nickpope@secstan.com>
To: Ed Shallow
<ed.shallow@rogers.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:42:54
AM
Subject: Enveloped XML signatures in non-XML documents
Ed,
Can you confirm that you are happy with the resolution to you
comment 25 on
Enveloped XML signatures in non XML documents.
as
follows:
> > 25) line 1223-1226: "In the case of a non-XML input
document, or when
> > these child elements are omitted, then the server
places the signature
> > in the input document in accordance with
procedures defined in a
> > profile or as part of the server
policy."
> >
> > I believe we should reject non-XML Documents
as default core
> > processing when Enveloped signatures are
requested.
I propose that this is replaced by:
"In the case of a
non-XML input document, or when these child elements are
omitted, then the
server will return an error unless alternative procedures
are defined by a
profile or in the server policy for handling such
a
situation."
Nick