RE: [ebcore] 2009 issues from LA GS1 meeting conference

["Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com>]

I think that the preliminary lists could be considered candidate issues
if accepted by the subcommittee, and when accepted, then Jira tracking
would be OK with me. We probably want to treat many issues as mainly
editorial, and some subset of them as substantive. But that is a good
point for consideration in the subcommittee. 

(Is there a subcommittee mailing list? I have not found it yet but will
try to post to it about CPPA v 3 maintenance details. For the moment,
since ebCore is not high volume and questions about maintenance scope
may be of more general interest, I will post to ebCore.)



-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:44 AM
To: Moberg Dale
Cc: ebcore@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebcore] 2009 issues from LA GS1 meeting conference

Hi Dale,

Perhaps we should consider using JIRA for issue tracking now that it is 
available from OASIS. It is really a fabulous issue tracking system.

Moberg Dale wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>  
>
> I had some unplanned travel and obligations come up so I have not 
> assembled the complete issues list, which will require going back over

> about 250 pages of notes.
>
>  
>
> But I do have the most recent editorial discussion list from spring of

> 2009.
>
>  
>
> I am enclosing that for a start on Friday.
>
>  
>
> Dale Moberg
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com