Re: [ebxml-bp] eBusiness Metamodel EARLY DRAFT 0.03

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Monica J. Martin wrote

>
> mm1: Duane, this seems to reflect functionality that does not exist or 
> is planned later in some of the technical specification development. I 
> am interested where the requirements came from and where those 
> requirements are held/defined, given the changes you have made in the 
> model. 

That is incorrect.  It is forensic and is taken from the existing 
approved specs (BP v 1.01, CPA v 2.0, MS v 2.0, CCTS v 2.01, UMM N090 
R12, TA 1.04 and eb Requirements v 1.06).  What components are you 
referring to?

>
> mm1: If you look at the work item list for ebBP v2.0 you will find 
> that we have resolved to make TTP an element with conditionality 
> likely attached. 

Cool  + 1

>
> mm1: See comments (not flames in notes in the .pdf) for ease of 
> understanding comment to model.

C'mon - no flames???  I figured such work was at least good for 2-5 
flames ;-)

I am not able to work on this right now but will resume when things are 
less busy.  

D

-- 
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com