[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebsoa] SOA BUP (was - Quick answers to David's questions)
Duane Nickull wrote: > > +1 - I believe that having Business Use Patterns is important in order > to map those to the SOA patterns. That is the differentiator that our > architecture is specific to those business patterns. > > The problem will be deciding what level of granularity to go into each > business pattern or how many we do. Perhaps we embrace a methodology > for allowing people to define their own patterns. It would be arrogant > of us to think that we, as a group, could define all the patterns that > would ever be used by business on a global scale IMO. > > The best course of action will be to probably black box the methodology > for now, just say there is one, that allow people to capture the > business lexicon in a series of artifacts, some of which should be BUP?? +1 Joe > I know that BCM, UMM, RUP and other methodologies have driven at this > for years. > > Comments? > > Two reminder as chair: > > First - let's make sure we don;t cc people who we know are on the list. > We only needone copy each. > > Second - we should try to keep the thread titles specific to the > content. I changed this one to SOA BUP. > > Thanks > > /d > > -- > Senior Standards Strategist > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://www.adobe.com -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]