[Fwd: FW: [ebxml-bp] Proposal for correlation mechanism in ebBP / WSDLmapping]

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Forwarded for Rajesh who has had problems sending to our list. JJ Dubray 
is on vacation until next Tuesday, so we may have a delayed response. 
Other responses from the team encouraged. Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Rajesh Pradhan
> *Sent:* Monday, August 02, 2004 2:50 PM
> *To:* 'ebXML BP'
> *Cc:* 'Jean-Jacques Dubray'
> *Subject:* RE: [ebxml-bp] Proposal for correlation mechanism in ebBP / 
> WSDL mapping
> *Importance:* High
>
> Jean-Jacques,
>  
> My apologies for piping up this late in the mapping process, but I 
> have a few points apropos the context :) ..
>  
> I agree that WS CTXT  is the best of the lot. However , is making  it 
> normative the best way to proceed ?There exist other mechanisms like 
> WS-Addressing ( I'm not sure if they have licensing restrictions ) . 
> There are also other cases where opaque correlation sets might make 
> more sense ( correlation sets managed by the engines with just their 
> mechanism schemas referenced in the correlation set definition ) . 
>  
> Is there a way by which we can allow the CSets to have different 
> schemes ? The biggest advantage I see is that if the correlation 
> scheme is already defined, then the modeler does not need to define 
> one whilst mapping.
>  
>  
> Just my two bits,
>  
> Thanks,
> Rajesh.