RE: [ebxml-bp] [ebBP] 10/25/2004: Working Draft Schema Availablefor Evaluation

["Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com>]

BusinessCollaboration may be the preferred construct for new designs,
IMO.

The others were retained to 1. keep in synch with CPPA 20, 2. to allow
eventually for xslt transforms from earlier versions to the new 2.0
version.

The design now treats these as basically differing in number of roles,
as you note.

Several meetings ago there was consensus to unify these "choreography
containers"  

-----Original Message-----
From: Sacha Schlegel [mailto:sschlegel@cyclonecommerce.com] 
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 6:48 AM
To: Monica J. Martin
Cc: ebXML BP
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] [ebBP] 10/25/2004: Working Draft Schema
Availablefor Evaluation

Hi BP team

In the ebBPSS-2_oct25.xsd there is the 

o BinaryCollaborationType
o MultiPartyCollaborationType
o BusinessCollaborationType

Except the Role element these types are equal.

o BinaryCollaborationType has exactly 2 roles
o BusinessCollaborationType has minimal 2 roles
o MultipartyCollaborationType has minimal 3 roles

Is there room for confusion? 

Qustion: What type is a Collaborytion with 4 roles?
BusinessCollaborationType or MultipartyCollaborationType?

Question: What type is a Collaboration with 2 roles?
BinaryCollaborationType or BusinessCollaborationType?

Sorry I do not have an answer.

Guess it does not matter but still confuses. Guess there are no
implications...

Regards

Sacha

Am Montag, den 25.10.2004, 11:39 -0700 schrieb Monica J. Martin:
> As promised, the working draft v2.0 schema is available for review and

> will serve as the basis for technical specification changes.  A notice

> was sent to the TC this morning that the schema has been uploaded to 
> Kavi Documents under 'Schema.'  Please review the schema and use the 
> list of references for your evaluation.
> 
> Reference: 
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-bp/download.php/9815/
ebBPSS-2_oct25.xsd
> (Under Kavi Documents, Schema, ebBPSS-2_oct25.xsd).
> 
> Please submit all comments to the ebBP list by COB (PDT) by Friday, 5 
> November 2004.  We can address them in the calls either via the list
or 
> calls 1 or 8 November depending on when they are received.
> 
> Thank you as the editors' team appreciates you taking the time to
review 
> the work and provide comment.
> 
> Dale Moberg
> Monica J. Martin
>