Re: [ebxml-bp] [public-comment-00000] supplement validation errors

[Monica J Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

See inline (mm1).

> nagahashi: Hi,
> I had a quick look on the public comment from Simon Sprott
> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp-comment/200508/msg00000.html). 
>
>
> he says following three files in supplement package have validation 
> errors:
>
> - ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd
> - ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExamplePIP7c7For1.01-en.xml
> - ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExampleTransformFor1.01-en.xml
>
> I confirmed the errors with XMLSpy.
> Problem in ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd has been resolved by Monica's fix.
> Other two seem to have errors easy to correct (wrong element names, 
> missing elements, etc.) I will further look into it.
>
> Before looking into the details of the issue, can anybody help with 
> following?
>
> 1) Intent of this supplement package is to demonstrate transformation 
> of BPSS 1.01 instance to BPSS 2.01 instance, right? I guessed the role 
> of each file to be: 

Assumption is correct (Originally, we termed it a 'starting point' for 
an example).

> [1] ebxmlbp-2.01-cd-ExamplePIP7c7For1.01-en.xml - a BPSS 1.01 instance.
> [2] ebxmlbp-2.01-cd-ExampleTransformFor1.01-en.xsl - a transformation
> [3] ebxmlbp-2.01-cd-ExampleTransformFor1.01-en.xml - a BPSS 2.01 
> instance generated from [1] with [2].

mm1: Yes, Dale to confirm please.

> I found [1] has default namespace set to 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ebxmlbp/ebbp-2.0 (BPSS 2.0) - this should 
> have been the ns for BPSS 1.01.
>
> 2) Does anybody have XSD for BPSS 1.01? 

mm1: See: http://www.ebxml.org/specs/index.htm#technical_specifications 
(.xsd in the list).

> The one I have is written in old XMLSchema (2000/10) and I am not sure 
> this is the right schema to use. If anybody has the "sure one", please 
> send it to me! 

mm1: AFAIK, this is correct. If we wish to refactor it, we should 
discuss with the team. Thanks.