[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ebBP 9/11/2006: Errata Update including Directory Changes - PROCESS TOPROCEED
As of today, 11 September, there have been no comments on these proposed changes. Therefore as specified in Section 3.5 of the TC ProcesS, the new revisions necessitate [1]: 1. A Committee Draft Vote on the Errata as APPROVED ERRATA * INITIATE CD VOTE ON ERRATA 2. Explicitly vote to verify the changes are non-substantive in nature * VOTING THAT THE APPROVED ERRATA IS NON-SUBSTANTIVE 3. Conducting a 15-day Public Review for the Approved Errata. * VOTING TO SUBMIT APPROVED ERRATA TO PUBLIC REVIEW 4. Confirming proposed corrections in Approved Errata. * FULL MAJORITY VOTE FOR APPROVED ERRATA We have agreed to engage on 1. and 2. above. I will integrate 3. into the ballot text. Then we can start the CD vote process. As we discussed last week, there will not be a meeting tomorrow because the vote is to begin. NOTE, THERE WILL BE A MEETING 18 SEPTEMBER 2006. Thank you. [1] See: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.5 (AND #3.4). ====== Martin 5 September 2006 As we discussed this morning, please provide any comments by Monday, 11 September 2006. I'll post a CD candidate and initiate the Kavi vote for 7 days after I integrate any comments received. Thanks. ============== Martin 4 September 2006: In order to accommodate the directory changes that were negotiated with OASIS. I have proposed a minor change to the Errata that may be integrated into our next technical specification update. This change is editorial and no substantive change is required. Please review the changes that include: * Namespace URI reference and explanation * Example updates * Other editorial changes This is a redlined working draft. See: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-bp/download.php/20112/ebxmlbp-v2.0.4-Errata-wd-r02-en.doc We can discuss this in tomorrow's call to see if these changes meet our requirements. Remember that OASIS has published an Errata process and I am discussing how to handle this with them, given we've already done an Errata and the changes we are discussing were to accommodate tool limitations re: directories. Thanks.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]