[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Sachs [ebxml-cppa-negot] 11/16/2002: Responses to Marty's Commentson Martin
Monica,
Here are my replies to the your rejoinders on your comments on the
negotiation specification.
5.2, Semantic negotiation: There are now statements that the negotiation
algorithm is out of scope in both section 5.2 and section 14.
5.5, Intermediary: I have rewritten section 5.5 to state:
- Negotiation through an intermediary (negotiation broker) is out of scope
for version 1.
- Negotiation through a message-forwarding intermediary that is not aware
of the purpose of the messages can be used if its manner of use is
supported by the MSG specification.
"Business Process Specification": Per your suggestion, I have asked Brian
Hayes for his view on substituting "business process specification" for
"BPSS instance document". I have also changed a few instances of "BPSS
instance" to "BPSS instance document."
13.15.2, Choreography of final CPA exchange: I have called Hima's
attention to your comment and asked him to discuss with you.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
Monica Martin
<mmartin@certivo. To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, ebxml-cppa-negot@lists.oasis-open.org
net> cc: Brian.Hayes@UCLAlumni.net
Subject: Sachs [ebxml-cppa-negot] 11/16/2002: Responses to Marty's Comments on Martin
11/16/2002 09:45
PM
Marty,
See a few additional comments in line. Attached two .gifs from BCP that
I did not send earlier.
Brian,
You might note the question for Section 12.1.1 for using the term BPSS
instance that CPPA-Negot refers to for an XML instance document. As
well, check Section 13.15.2 for their open question on using an
AcceptanceAck on a Response (Reference our previous BPSS/BCP/UMM
discussions). Perhaps that may be appropriate, if the goal is to
negotiate; however, I am not sure. I've attached the draft document for
you to reference.
Thanks.
Monica
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:06 PM
To: ebxml-cppa-negot@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ebxml-cppa-negot] responses to Monica Martin's comments
Attached is my response to Monica Martin's comments. Monica has raised
some excellent issues that need discussion by all of us.
Regards,
Marty
(See attached file: resp.to.MMartin.comments.10Nov02.doc)
************************************************************************
*************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
************************************************************************
*************
#### Receiving_bcp_v01_102902.gif has been removed from this note on
November 18 2002 by Martin W Sachs
#### Initiating_bcp_v5_102902.gif has been removed from this note on
November 18 2002 by Martin W Sachs
#### NCPAReview_mm2_ms1_111602.doc has been removed from this note on
November 18 2002 by Martin W Sachs
#### Draft_CPPA_Negotiation_101402.zip has been removed from this note on
November 18 2002 by Martin W Sachs
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC