Re: Endpoint question

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

I believe that the intention was that the allPurpose endpoint would be used
if there was no need to differentiate different functions of the endpoint.
If the team agrees that this was the intent, the text should be fixed and,
if it can be done, the DTD and schema should be changed to show that the
value is allPurpose or the enumeration of the other possibilities.


Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 08/02/2001 01:34:17 AM

To:   ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
cc:
Subject:  Endpoint question




Section 7.5.14 indicates that a Transport  element may have multiple
Endpoint elements, each of different types. The  question I have is whether
these types have to be non-overlapping.

Can an Endpoint element of type allPurpose co-exist  with another Endpoint
element of type Response under the same Transport element?  If so, does it
mean that a response can be sent to either Endpoint?

Thanks,
-Arvola


Arvola Chan (arvola@tibco.com)
TIBCO Software  (on loan to RosettaNet)
+1-650-846-5046 (US-Pacific)