[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] Re: CPP/A 1.06 draft
Tony:
Word is notorious with respect to its ability to assign
consistent line numbers. When I printed out the ebMS 2.0 spec, I could not even
get the on-screen and printed line numbers to match.
I suggest you post both a Word and a PDF version starting with
1.06. Comments that identify specific line numbers should be based on the PDF
version.
I was going over the spec this morning in order to map out my
proposed changes. I notice that the descriptions for ApplicationCertificateRef
and ApplicationSecurityDetailsRef are rather sketchy. I think we may need some
elaboration from Peter and/or Dale. Since we reached agreement on quite a number
of issues assigned to Peter and Dale, I think there will be changes from one or
both of them for the 1.07 draft.
Assuming a schedule of 2/11 for 1.07 and 2/18 for 1.08, and
that we must have a TC approved specification to submit to Karl Best by March 1,
it seems that 1.08 should be the one that TC members vote on. It may be too late
to wait for a 1.09 draft on 2/25.
Regards,
-Arvola
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC