[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-cppa] RE: RE: CONFERENCE CALL -- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17,2002 (dispute resolution)
Dale,
The dispute-resolution call agenda includes some words on how the CPA
might be used.
It might be as simple as to add an element under CollaborationRole
identifying the dispute resolution procedure to be used with the particular
business process and pair of partners. It would have to appear under both
partners and be the same. The CPP could enumerate various acceptable
procedures.
Another possibility would be to add the dispute-resolution information at
the top level so it only has to appear once but that would require a list
for each CollaborationRole element that appears in the CPP and CPA. IDREF
attributes could be used to point to the CollaborationRole elements. This
would be consistent with the way we handle packaging, delivery channels,
and certificates.
Any other thoughts?
If we have a few minutes on the all today, I could briefly introduce the
topic.
For those who aren't aware of this activity, there has been a proposal to
work on dispute resolution in OASIS. This correspondence refers to an
upcoming conference call on the subject.
Regards,
Marty
*************************************************************************************
Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************
----- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 04/12/2002 10:27 AM -----
"Karl F. Best"
<karl.best@oasis- To: "Pim van der Eijk" <pim.vandereijk@oasis-open.org>
open.org> cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Subject: RE: RE: CONFERENCE CALL -- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 2002
04/12/2002 08:13
AM
Pim:
Please include Marty Sachs (mwsachs@us.ibm.com) on these messages, as he
will be calling in representing the CPPA TC.
</karl>
=================================================================
Karl F. Best
OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
+1 978.667.5115 x206
karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pim van der Eijk [mailto:pim.vandereijk@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:09 AM
> To: Pravir Chawdhry; Pim van der Eijk; margie.pina@oasis-open.org;
> karl.best@oasis-open.org; patrick.gannon@oasis-open.org
> Cc: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; dan@civics.com
> Subject: RE: RE: CONFERENCE CALL -- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 2002
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> As requested by Pravir, I would suggest the following list of topics:
> - a brief introduction by Pravir of his ODR XML work,
> focussing on current status, plans, his views on moving this forward;
> - related activities in LegalXML, by Dan Greenwood;
> - Collaboration Agreements in ebXML, and suggestions how
> Dispute Resolution could be tied into them, by representative of CPPA
> team.
> - General discussion / next steps / ...
>
> A web site dedicated to Pravir's work on ODR is
> http://econfidence.jrc.it. This site also provides references
> to related work in the
> US.
>
> Pravir and I had a telephone discussion earlier this year,
> during which we came up with the following list of potential
> synergies:
>
> - Dispute resolution is a business process. The ebXML BPSS
> could be used to express this process, so that BPSS compliant
> e-business
> collaboration management systems can be used to implement and
> manage dispute resolution;
> - The ebXML CPP/CPA could be used to allow two partners to
> express their formal agreement to use a particular dispute resolution
> scheme;
> - The secure, reliable ebXML messaging standard would provide
> an ideal framework for the operational exchange of messages that
> implement a particular dispute resolution process;
> - Perhaps the generic CPA (for arbitrary e-business
> collaborations) could be extended with an extension reference
> element that links
> to such an ODR CPA, with semantics "any disputes arising
> during execution of this business process are to be handled using the
> referenced DR process".
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pim van der Eijk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pravir Chawdhry [mailto:pravir.chawdhry@jrc.it]
> > Sent: 11 April 2002 14:24
> > To: Pim van der Eijk; margie.pina@oasis-open.org;
> > karl.best@oasis-open.org; patrick.gannon@oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: RE: CONFERENCE CALL -- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 2002
> >
> >
> > Pim,
> >
> > OK, That is fine if this starts at 16:00 DST in central europe.
> >
> > Just that GMT in the original message was wrong that led to
> my concern
> > since GMT is always absolute time (without reference to DST).
> >
> > BTW, Could you please send me an outline of the points to
> be discussed.
> > I have asked two of my colleagues (Marc Wilikens and Clive Best) to
> > join from our end.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > -Pravir
> >
> >
> > Dr Pravir K Chawdhry
> > Cybersecurity & New Technologies for Combating Fraud
> > Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen
> > Joint Research Centre, TP-361
> > European Commission
> > I-21020 ISPRA (VA)
> > Italy
> > Tel: +39-0332-785823/789575
> > Fax: +39-0332-789576
> > Email: Pravir.Chawdhry@jrc.it
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pim van der Eijk" <pim.vandereijk@oasis-open.org>
> > Date: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 pm
> > Subject: RE: CONFERENCE CALL -- WEDNESDAY, APRIL 17, 2002
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I checked with http://www.timezoneconverter.com/ which
> claims that:
> > >
> > > 10:00:00 Wed Apr 17 2002 in US/Eastern converts to
> > > 16:00:00 Wed Apr 17 2002 in Europe/Rome
> > >
> > > DST* is in effect on this date/time in US/Eastern
> > > DST* is in effect on this date/time in Europe/Rome
> > > *Daylight Saving Time
> > >
> > > If I oversee something here, please let me know!
> > >
> > > Pim
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC