Re: [ebxml-cppa] Must a CPA always require a CollaborationRole perParty?

[Sacha Schlegel <sschlegel@cyclonecommerce.com>]

Hi ebCPPA team

I forgot to add, to use the MSH's ping and pong signals to test the
connectivity.

Sacha

On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:47 -0700, Sacha Schlegel wrote:
> Hi ebCPPA team
> 
> What is the shortest possible CPA?
> 
> Unfortunately a CPA requires at least 1 CollaborationRole per PartyInfo.
> This makes sense when we want to exchange business documents of a
> collaborative business process.
> 
> To "just" test MSH connectivity between two MSH's but still be based on
> the configuration of a CPA (for PartyInfo configuration, delivery
> channel with transport protocol and transport protocol endpoint, and
> document exchange configuration) we would not need the CollaborationRole
> per PartyInfo because there is none.
> 
> The alternative would be to add a dummy CollaborationRole including a dummy ProcessSpecification element, a dummy Role element and an empty ServiceBinding element.
> 
> Was there ever a discussion to add a minOccurs="0" to the
> CollaborationRole element in the CPPA XML schema? 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Sacha  
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>