Re: [ebxml-cppa] Re: [ebxml-iic] Simple trading partnerconfigurationfor ebMS

[Matthew MacKenzie <matt@xmlglobal.com>]

I'm not afraid of BPSS, I just don't have people lining up asking for 
it.  3/4 of customers coming to us for messaging just want to replace 
some automated FTP system they have been using for 10 years.  I'm not 
saying that this fact won't change, thats just how it is.

-Matt

On Tuesday, Aug 27, 2002, at 08:33 America/Vancouver, bhaugen wrote:

>
> From: Matthew MacKenzie
>
>> Something very interesting is coming out of this, IMO.  The concept of
>> profiles which could leverage the basic CPA schema and constrain it
>> based on the particular needs of an industry or market place is quite
>> cool.  A by product is that we would end up with a CPA that is very
>> easy to deal with if all you want  to do is basic ebXML messaging,
>> without any of the BPSS stuff.
>
> Don't be so afraid of the BPSS stuff.
> The transaction level is almost exactly the same
> as RosettaNet PIPs.  And anybody who does PIPs
> already has code that can be reused.
>
> Also, the idea of profiles works for BPSS, too.
> That was one of the basic ideas behind the
> Business Collaboration Patterns project in eBTWG.
> We called it patterns or templates, but it's the
> same idea:  predefine something that works
> out of the box.
>
> -Bob Haugen
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>