RE: Minutes from conf call of 14 August 2003, and next scheduled conf call

[Jacques Durand <JDurand@fsw.fujitsu.com>]

Title: minutes

Mike and all:

 

Thanks for folowing-up on this... Mike, I can set-up the call if you want (unless it is already "in the mail" on your side)

 

Possible agenda (please update as needed):

 

Agenda Monday Aug 18:

 

1. Status of MS conformance test suite spec. (Mike Kass editor)

- Gal assessment of current draft of MS conf test suite. Overview of remaining issues.

- test requirements and their test coverage: comments on Pete/Monica/Mike doc.

- ordering / partitioning based on config/CPA? (how to avoid too many reconfigs)

- conformance profiles or levels (detailed content?)

 

2. BPSS test update (Serm K., Monica M.):

- BSI testing definition.

- what cooperation/feedback with/to the BPSS team (emphasis on testing operations).

- The "BCF" concept (business collaboration Framework) .

 

3. Implementers corner, and PR:

- Drake Certivo test driver status.

- IIC members demo (Test Framework, test suites) at XML 2003, 7-12 December

 

 

Jacques

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kass [mailto:michael.kass@nist.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:57 PM
To: Jacques Durand; ebXML IIC - main list (E-mail)
Subject: Minutes from conf call of 14 August 2003, and next scheduled conf call

Jacques and all,

 

     Pete, Monica and I went through the list of ebXML MS conformance test requirement whose test coverage

was in question because of either (spec ambiguity, MSH vs. app-level testing, or test framework constraints ). 

 

Attached is a resolution list of those particular requirements.  A more formal list will be published tomorrow.

 

   Based on this discussion, I have begun work on the abstract and executable test cases so that they match

our agreement.

 

   Pete Wenzel has already posted the "MS spec related issues to the MS TC" for feedback.

 

   I am arranging a conference call for Monday, should have the dial-in info tomorrow.

 

Cheers,

Mike