[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-iic] [Fwd: Durand 8/19/2004: Testing isIntelligibleCheckRequired]
> Durand: But what do you mean here: > >...only if the message (not the business document) passes structured > or schema validation. > The bus doc may of course be other than XML, but it seems important > that a Receipt > also covers the validation of the business doc, if one wants it to > mean more than say an RM Ack... - or at least, shouldn't BPSS be more > explicit about distinguishing when > mm2: See the link referenced which clarifies. We wanted to effectively differentiate what happens in syntactic checking vs. application handover and processing that would include conditional constraints, business rules, etc. See <<<<<......>>>>>> below. Thanks. > mm1: I provided this to Jacques late last week and it triggered more > investigation on my part (and the ebBP TC) because some of the > technical specification language was not as clear as it could have > been. <<<<<See this thread from today regarding this attribute (which > basically is an additional syntactic check on message, business > document and document envelope): > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-bp/200408/msg00046.html. > Thanks.>>>>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]