[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: PIP IDs
+1 Martin W Sachs wrote: > > In my opinion it makes more sense for Service to point to the PIP ID and > action to point to the particular business transaction within the PIP. In > other words one execution of a PIP is a conversation. I believe that some > of the PIPs include multiple business transactions. > > Regards, > Marty > > ************************************************************************************* > > Martin W. Sachs > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center > P. O. B. 704 > Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 > 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 > Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM > Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com > ************************************************************************************* > > David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> on 07/19/2001 10:45:54 AM > > To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com> > cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> > Subject: PIP IDs > > David, in the F2F you mentioned the need for a new element to contain > industry specific business process identifiers such as a RosettaNet PIP > identifier. Could this be done with Service/Action where the Service would > be something like RNet and the Action something like PIP3A1 (Request > Quote)? > > <eb:Service>urn:services:RNet</eb:Service> > <eb:Action>PIP3A1</eb:Action> > > Regards, > > David Fischer > Drummond Group. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC