Re: PIP IDs

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

In my opinion it makes more sense for Service to point to the PIP ID and
action to point to the particular business transaction within the PIP. In
other words one execution of a PIP is a conversation.  I believe that some
of the PIPs include multiple business transactions.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> on 07/19/2001 10:45:54 AM

To:   "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
cc:   ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:  PIP IDs




David, in the F2F you mentioned the need for a new element to contain
industry specific business process identifiers such as a RosettaNet PIP
identifier.  Could this be done with Service/Action where the Service would
be something like RNet and the Action something like PIP3A1 (Request
Quote)?

<eb:Service>urn:services:RNet</eb:Service>
<eb:Action>PIP3A1</eb:Action>

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group.