[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0
Iwasa We discussed this once during the develoment of version 1.0 and agreed that we would use Acknowledgment (without the extra 'e'). I think we should use this consistently ... anyone disagree? David -----Original Message----- From: iwasa [mailto:iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 8:33 PM To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0 All, Please put this problem on the issue list. There are two kind of "Acknowledg(e)ment" in the spec. And I remember this caused interoperability problem in the POC. Because while one implementation was using "Acknowledgement", other implementation was using "Acknowledgment". The line number which are using: "Acknowledgment" are : Line # 125, 173, 386, 388, 629, 809, 828, 832, 1137, 1138, 1142, 1152, 1156, 1157, 1161, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1180, 1229, 1508, 1550, 1551, 1602, 1605, 1645, 1647, 1668, 1739, 1751, 1766, 1768, 1777, 1782, 1783, 1820, 1823, 1840, 1842, 1844, 1848, 1867, 1882, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2500, "Acknowledgement" are : Line# 130, 201, 830, 831, 915, 1140, 1171, 1172, 1741, 1742, 1743, 1781, 1787, 1797, 1807, 1809, 1810, 1816, 1817, 1819, 1850, 2499, 2960, Iwasa, Fujitsu ----- Original Message ----- From: <ian.c.jones@bt.com> To: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:26 AM Subject: Message Service 1.0 Amendements > Colleagues, > > The period for errors, comments, amendments and clarification to the > existing ebXML Message service Specification Version 1.0 is now open and > will close 12 Midnight (pacific Daylight time) Friday August 17. > > All comments etc. received by this time will be formally addressed > and managed by the OASIS ebXML Messaging Technical Committee. These > comments will be considered for inclusion in a revised version (currently > identified as version 1.1). Any comments/issues raised prior to the issue > of the specification which have not be addressed must be re submitted with > reference to the existing version. Comments submitted since the issue of > the current version will be include in this comment period. > > When submitting comments it would be helpful if they are submitted > singly to prevent interwoven threads of possibly unrelated comments forming > which are very difficult to follow and manage. > > Ian Jones > E-Commerce Engineer > > PP E1B > 84-85 Adam Street, Cardiff, CF24 2XF > > *Tel: +44 (0)29 2072 4063 > > * Fax: +44 (0)29 2045 8781 > Email: ian.c.jones@bt.com > > British Telecommunications plc > Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ > Registered in England no. 1800000. > > This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications > plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to > be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not > the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution > or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have > received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or > email (to the numbers or address above) immediately. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC