RE: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0

["Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>]

>>> Acknowledgment has only two 'e's. <<<

I have to disagree ;) ... you know I would Chris.

You can validly spell it with three as in "Acknowledgement". In dictionaries
both are valid (look it up at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary.htm). We just
need to agree on which to use and I'm suggesting two "e"s in the spec.

It really depends on which side of the Atlantic you were brought up and who
your English teacher was. 

David
(A Brit living in the US)

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:03 AM
To: Burdett, David
Cc: 'iwasa'; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0


Acknowledgment has only two 'e's. I agree that the spelling should
be consistent throughout the spec.

Cheers,

Chris

"Burdett, David" wrote:
> 
> Iwasa
> 
> We discussed this once during the develoment of version 1.0 and agreed
that
> we would use Acknowledgment (without the extra 'e'). I think we should use
> this consistently ... anyone disagree?
> 
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iwasa [mailto:iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 8:33 PM
> To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Bug report for ebXML MS1.0
> 
> All,
> 
> Please put this problem on the issue list.
> 
> There are two kind of "Acknowledg(e)ment" in the spec.
> And I remember this caused interoperability problem in the
> POC. Because while one implementation was using "Acknowledgement",
> other implementation was using "Acknowledgment".
> 
> The line number which are using:
> "Acknowledgment" are :
> Line # 125, 173, 386, 388, 629, 809, 828, 832, 1137, 1138, 1142,
>          1152, 1156, 1157, 1161, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1180, 1229,
>          1508, 1550, 1551, 1602, 1605, 1645, 1647, 1668, 1739,
>          1751, 1766, 1768, 1777, 1782, 1783, 1820, 1823, 1840,
>          1842, 1844, 1848, 1867, 1882, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2500,
> 
> "Acknowledgement" are :
> Line#  130, 201, 830, 831, 915, 1140, 1171, 1172, 1741, 1742,
>          1743, 1781, 1787, 1797, 1807, 1809, 1810, 1816, 1817,
>          1819, 1850, 2499, 2960,
> 
> Iwasa, Fujitsu
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ian.c.jones@bt.com>
> To: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:26 AM
> Subject: Message Service 1.0 Amendements
> 
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > The period for errors, comments, amendments and clarification to the
> > existing ebXML Message service Specification  Version 1.0 is now open
and
> > will close 12 Midnight (pacific Daylight time) Friday August 17.
> >
> > All comments etc. received by this time will be formally addressed
> > and managed by the OASIS ebXML Messaging Technical Committee.  These
> > comments will be considered for inclusion in a revised version
(currently
> > identified as version 1.1).  Any comments/issues raised prior to the
issue
> > of the specification which have not be addressed must be re submitted
with
> > reference to the existing version.  Comments submitted since the issue
of
> > the current version will be include in this comment period.
> >
> > When submitting comments it would be helpful if they are submitted
> > singly to prevent interwoven threads of possibly unrelated comments
> forming
> > which are very difficult to follow and manage.
> >
> > Ian Jones
> > E-Commerce Engineer
> >
> > PP E1B
> > 84-85 Adam Street, Cardiff, CF24 2XF
> > > *Tel:  +44 (0)29 2072 4063
> > > * Fax: +44 (0)29 2045 8781
> > Email: ian.c.jones@bt.com
> >
> > British Telecommunications plc
> > Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> > Registered in England no. 1800000.
> >
> > This electronic message contains information from British
> Telecommunications
> > plc which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended
> to
> > be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are
not
> > the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution
> > or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have
> > received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone
> or
> > email (to the numbers or address above) immediately.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org