[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: T2 SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo
David, The "flexibility" to which you refer is not the intended puspose of SyncReply. The puspose that you see for this should in fact be a separate transport binding IMO (even if it is still HTTP). Cheers, Chris David Fischer wrote: > > How do you set SyncReply on a message-by-message basis? If I understand you > correctly, syncReply MUST apply to ALL transfers between two parties or to > None -- must always be the same. I think we may want a little more flexibility. > We allow this flexibility in multi-hop, why not in single-hop? > > In EDIINT, syncReply was always default to True and we occasionally would change > to False for very large files -- allowing the connection to close rather than > wait (potentially hours) for a very large file to be decrypted or the MIC to be > generated for a NRR. (Instead of syncReply, EDIINT calls this parameter > Receipt-Delivery-Option). IMO, we need to allow for the unforeseen. > > In the case of ReliableMessagingMethod, I'm not even sure what this does or why > we need it at all. What does a value of "Transport" mean -- the spec doesn't > say? I assume it means just send the message and don't worry about RM since > this hop can't handle it? I think this will never be used but David seemed to > think it was needed and I don't have any heartburn with that. Since I this sits > right next to SyncReply in the Ack, I included it in parameters which need to be > allowed without an Ack. Either way is fine with me. > > David. > > -----Original Message----- > From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:58 AM > To: David Fischer > Cc: ebXML Msg > Subject: Re: T2 SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in > QualityOfServiceInfo > > David, > > Where does this requirement come from? In the case of > syncReply, the CPA is what determines this. In the absence > of a CPA, then a virtual CPA applies. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > David Fischer wrote: > > > > There should be nothing in the Via which is not also in other headers. Via > > should only be used for multi-hop intermediaries. In the case of SyncReply, > > there is no single-hop way of requesting SyncReply=true. > > > > Attributes SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod should also be in > > QualityOfServiceInfo. They should retain their current defaults. > > > > Regards, > > > > David Fischer > > Drummond Group. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC