[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: T2 SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo
I have to think RM can be both. I would also think that, if they could, the IM should try to match the RM request of the end-to-end although we can't require this. I believe the whole point is to be able to trace if possible (remember the FedEx Black Box discussion). If RM is only end-to-end, why do we even need the Via? I think we have to allow for all-of-the-above. David Fischer Drummond Group. -----Original Message----- From: Chris.Ferris@Sun.COM [mailto:Chris.Ferris@Sun.COM]On Behalf Of christopher ferris Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 1:04 PM To: Scott Hinkelman Cc: HUGHES,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex1); ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: T2 SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo Scott Hinkelman wrote: > > I agree. RM is From <-> To. > However, does this imply that if a CPA is used, and IMs are in the > picture that multiparty (if an IM is a party) CPA is required? Seems to me. > > Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer > XML Industry Enablement > IBM e-business Standards Strategy > 512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519) > srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074 > <snip/> I disagree. The RM protocol is point to point. The QOS characteristic is certainly and most definitely end-to-end. There is a clear distinction in my mind between the two. Cheers, Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-msg-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC