OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: T2 SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo


Thank you for showing intention of the deliveryReceipt. I have one

In the Message Service spec V1.0, "10.3.3 Generating an Acknowledgement
Message" on page 46 says:

    Depending on the value of the syncReply parameter, the
    Acknowledgement Message can also be sent at the same time as the
    response to the received message. ...

It means that if syncReply is set to False, the Reliable Acknowledgement
Message can not carry business level response. If so, at same time, the
Reliable Acknowledgement Message can not carry deliveryReceipt element
when syncReply is set to False. Because deliveryReceipt element is
always carried together business level response.

If the understanding above is correct, following description in the
specification is wrong:

  8.15 Combining ebXML SOAP Extension Elements
  8.15.8 Delivery Receipt element
     A DeliveryReceipt element may be present on any message.

Actually, when syncReply is set to False, DeliveryReceipt element can
not be present on Reliable Acknowledgement Message.

Is that correct?

On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:58:29 -0400
christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> wrote:
> David,
> I don't know what you're smoking. As for the history lesson, thanks,
> but I was there. 
> The spec clarifies the distinction between the delivery receipt
> and the acknowledgment in section To wit:
> 	Note: To clarify the distinction between an acknowledgement message 
> 	containing a DeliveryReceipt and a Reliable Messaging Acknowledgement:  
> 	(1) An acknowledgement message containing a Delivery Receipt 
> 	indicates the To Party has received the message. (2) The Reliable 
> 	Messaging Acknowledgment indicates a MSH, possibly only an 
> 	intermediate MSH, has received the message."

I'd like to propose that we change the term "(1) acknowledgement message"
into "(1) business level response". It seems to me that this is source
of the confusing about DeliveryReceipt.


SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com>
TEL:+81-45-476-4590(ext.7128-4241)  FAX:+81-45-476-4726(ext.7128-6783)
Planning Dep., Strategic Planning Div., Software Group, FUJITSU LIMITED

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC