[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: T2 Retry with Delivery Receipt
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:03:20 -0500 From: "David Fischer" <david@drummondgroup.com> <df>Correct, what might we do that is better? Do we really want to do anything?</df> No, I don't think we do. Despite the Partridge et. al. paper, I think we can rely on the transport protocols to catch bit corruption. Of course an IM should never stop an end-to-end retry; of course if the protocol allows for end-to-end retry, there would be an easy and well-defined way to differentiate. The proposed "retry count" is one way to do it. <df>Agreed. Is there another way you might prefer?</df> No, retry count is fine with me.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC