[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReply andReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo
We have discussed this in the past and I have asserted that garbage collection would actually never happen at the To Party (unless it was some sort of IM such as a Mailroom). For legal reasons, garbage collection of business documents cannot occur until after 7 years (garbage collection is not in the spec is it?). Instead of garbage collection, the To Party might occasionally Archive, which almost amounts to the same thing. Even this would be infrequent. I suppose such a restriction would have something to do with either PersistDuration, TimeToLive or n*Retries*RetryInterval. Or maybe this is something new which should go in the CPA? I would lean toward PersistDuration but I am not sure we have a definitive understanding of what this should be. OTOH, this question might be out of scope. Ralph works for an EDI software company, how often is archiving typically done? Is it done? Regards, David Fischer Drummond Group. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:25 PM To: david@drummondgroup.com Cc: arvola@tibco.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReply and ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:30:37 -0500 From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> The From Party can perform a Retry at any time it deems appropriate. Well, actually, I think there has to be some kind of restriction or else the To Party would never be able to garbage-collect its set of already-received message ID's, as we've discussed in the past.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC