[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: FW: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReplyandReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo
I thought this at first, but then I was told that there cannot be two DeliveryChannels to the same address. I that still correct? David Fischer Drummond Group. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:00 PM To: david@drummondgroup.com Cc: Chris.Ferris@sun.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: FW: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReply andReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:10:59 -0500 From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> Does this mean communications between two Trading Partners is ALWAYS RM or NEVER RM? We've already decided DeliveryChannel is address specific so there cannot be two DeliveryChannels between one set of addresses. Sorry if I missed something in the earlier mail (I just searched through the back-mail and couldn't find this), but why can't this work? The CPA seems very specifically designed for allowing different Services, and different Actions within Services, to each select a different DeliveryChannel.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC