[ebxml-msg] Re: [ebxml-cppa] Proposed schema changes,plus illustrative examp le

[Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>]

   Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:02:38 -0500
   From: "Martin W Sachs" <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>

   OK, that's fine with me, as long as we make it very clear to our
   readership that a PartyId, *despite its name*, does not uniquely
   identify a "party".  Is that right?

   MWS:  Let's try this:  An enterprise may own one or more PartyIds.  A given
   PartyId belongs to only one enterprise.  In that sense, it is unique.

That's fine, as far as the relationship between "enterprise" and
"PartyId" goes.  But I also think we have to state that the
relationship between "PartyId" and "party" is *not* that a PartyId
identifies a party, as one might otherwise presume from the name.

-- Dan