OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters


Suresh:

Please see my proposal in
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200111/msg00253.html

Regards,
-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
To: 'Tony Fletcher' <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>;
ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>;
ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters


>I am encouraged and hopeful that a solution to this issue will be found
>based on the "permessage" idea (as per Dale's earlier email "observer's
>report").
>The three cases that Tony outlines below may be used
>for analysis of individual entries in the CPA.
>It is not clear how the "permessage" notion will be built into the CPP.
>I plan to wait to see a clear description of the solution before further
>commenting.
>
>Regards,
>-Suresh
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Fletcher [mailto:tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:15 AM
>To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters
>
>
>Dear All,
>
>I would have thought that there are three cases that need to be allowed for
>in the CPA:
>
>1) The two parties to the CPA agree explicitly or implicitly that a
>parameter is not specified in the CPA and is to be handled by messaging as
>per the messaging spec. (which could be implicit, per session, per message,
>etc.)
>
>2) The two parties to the CPA agree to specify a default value in the
>CPA
>which is used if not present in the messaging exchange explicitly, but may
>be overridden by the use of the messaging service on a per message or per
>session basis.
>
>3) The two parties to the CPA agree to specify the parameter in the CPA
>and
>that is the value that shall be used - no messing!
>
>The Messaging and CPP/A groups need to agree which out 1), 2) & 3) are
>appropriate for each parameter of the messaging service.
>
>If the messaging group meeting has already passed this point and made a
>workable agreement then fine - I was only adding to the thread, not meaning
>to re-open discussion.
>
>Best Regards     Tony
>A M Fletcher
>Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX     UK
>Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701784         Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219
>tony.fletcher@choreology.com <mailto:tony.fletcher@choreology.com>
>(Home: amfletcher@iee.org)
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC