[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters
Suresh: Please see my proposal in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200111/msg00253.html Regards, -Arvola -----Original Message----- From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com> To: 'Tony Fletcher' <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org <ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters >I am encouraged and hopeful that a solution to this issue will be found >based on the "permessage" idea (as per Dale's earlier email "observer's >report"). >The three cases that Tony outlines below may be used >for analysis of individual entries in the CPA. >It is not clear how the "permessage" notion will be built into the CPP. >I plan to wait to see a clear description of the solution before further >commenting. > >Regards, >-Suresh > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Fletcher [mailto:tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:15 AM >To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: [ebxml-msg] CPA & MS overriding parameters > > >Dear All, > >I would have thought that there are three cases that need to be allowed for >in the CPA: > >1) The two parties to the CPA agree explicitly or implicitly that a >parameter is not specified in the CPA and is to be handled by messaging as >per the messaging spec. (which could be implicit, per session, per message, >etc.) > >2) The two parties to the CPA agree to specify a default value in the >CPA >which is used if not present in the messaging exchange explicitly, but may >be overridden by the use of the messaging service on a per message or per >session basis. > >3) The two parties to the CPA agree to specify the parameter in the CPA >and >that is the value that shall be used - no messing! > >The Messaging and CPP/A groups need to agree which out 1), 2) & 3) are >appropriate for each parameter of the messaging service. > >If the messaging group meeting has already passed this point and made a >workable agreement then fine - I was only adding to the thread, not meaning >to re-open discussion. > >Best Regards Tony >A M Fletcher >Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK >Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701784 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 >tony.fletcher@choreology.com <mailto:tony.fletcher@choreology.com> >(Home: amfletcher@iee.org) > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC