[ebxml-msg] Re: Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder

[SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com>]

David, 

On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 07:49:32 -0600
David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> There are other kinds of RM.  We are explicitly excluding them in the case of
> MessageOrder?

No, my change proposal for MessageOrder section does not exclude other
kinds of RM (reliable communication protocols). Please see my change
proposal again:

> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:09:17 +0900
> From: SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder
> In-reply-to: <NFBBIIHJNFIEBFENACIJKEKECDAA.david@drummondgroup.com>
> To: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>,
>  ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
> Message-id: <20011205153549.158E.SHIMA.MASA@jp.fujitsu.com>
...
>   P. 49, Line 2009
>     This line should be deleted, and insert following sentences after
>     line 2016.
> 
>         When the value of the messageOrderSemantics attribute is set to
>         "guaranteed", delivery behavior Once-and-Only-Once MUST be used.
>         In the specification, the Once-and-Only-Once delivery behavior
>         means that two conditions below are satisfied at same time:
> 
>         1) No lost message by one of following two mechanisms
>             - Reliable messaging described in "7.5 ebXML Reliable
>               Messaging Protocol". It means that the messages includes
>               AckRequested element or Acknowledgment element.
>             - Reliable communication protocol
>         2) No duplicate message by the mechanism described in "7.5.6
>            Duplicate Message Handling". It means that
>            duplicateElimination attribute is set to true.


Regards, 

--
SHIMAMURA Masayoshi <shima.masa@jp.fujitsu.com>
TEL:+81-45-476-4590(ext.7128-4241)  FAX:+81-45-476-4726(ext.7128-6783)
Planning Dep., Strategic Planning Div., Software Group, FUJITSU LIMITED