RE: [ebxml-msg] Message Order Inconsistency section 10 pp's 1,2

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

I thought that we had already agreed on: "if eb:MessageOrder is used, then
eb Reliable Messaging should be  used as well."

Since we haven't identified and don't have bindings for any other RM
protocols, the issue is moot.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> on 12/10/2001 10:36:22 PM

To:    "Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>, ebxml-msg
       <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
Subject:    RE: [ebxml-msg] Message Order Inconsistency section 10 pp's 1,2




Yes, I think you are right.  We talked about other RM mechanisms but  then
someone pointed out, the other RM mechanism will probably deliver in order
as well so there is no need for eb:MessageOrder.

IMO, if eb:MessageOrder is used, then eb Reliable Messaging should be  used
as well.

Thoughts, Comments, Objections?

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group
ebXML-MS Editor.
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Robert (GXS)  [mailto:Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001  1:37 PM
To: ebxml-msg
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Message Order  Inconsistency section 10 pp's 1,2


Section 10 paragraph 2 MessageOrder module SHOULD  only be used in
conjunction with a reliable messaging mechanism ..." conflicts  with
paragraph 1 "... Reliable Messaging MUST be used when a MessageOrder
element is present."