[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-msg] FW: V1.1 vs. V2.0
There seems to be quite a bit of sentiment for calling this v2.0. I haven't seen any dissention at all so I will proceed. On Brian's question, I don't know. I guess we won't have a "fixes and clarifications" version. Brian would then be in charge of v3.0 instead of v2.0? David. -----Original Message----- From: Gibb, Brian [mailto:Brian_Gibb@stercomm.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:06 PM To: 'David Fischer' Subject: RE: V1.1 vs. V2.0 I am fine with calling it 2.0. I wasn't on the call. What are we going to do about a 1.X with only error fixes, clarification, etc? -----Original Message----- From: David Fischer [mailto:david@drummondgroup.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:50 PM To: ebXML Interoperability Subject: V1.1 vs. V2.0 On the call, everyone seemed supportive of calling this spec v2.0. If you feel this way, please reply to my message on the ebXML Messaging list or send a message to the list stating your opinion. If all of you agree and there is no dissention on the list, I will make the change. Thanks, David.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC