[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSIand BSI and move on
>> mm1: David, I would suggest we have some clear boundaries before >> engaging ebSOA team. Some of the discussion surrounds assumptions >> about the role of the MSI or BSI should be clarified by the >> experienced parties and experts involved from ebBP and ebMS teams >> (not to say there are not experts in ebSOA). Thanks. > > Nickull: Those groups are where a lot of FUD comes from surrounding > the BSI. Some people actually stated they believed the BSI was > concrete and hence not an abstract artifact. > > Abstract = BSI > Concrete = MS, CPA and BPSS mm2: Education is always an opportunity Duane. Remember that the/these interface(s) may actually become physical in a deployable logical environment. I believe our original text surrounding this relationship was clear after all. However, I will in more detail review the many posts last night and today to see what can be improved upon in the text that was agreed to yesterday morning. Thanks.