RE: [egov-registry] eGov regrep

["Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>]

I this would provide a useful comparison. Let's do it.

Regards

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com]
> Sent: 11 June 2004 17:56
> To: Egov-Registry
> Subject: Re: [egov-registry] eGov regrep
>
>
> Paul et al :
> Given that -
> (1) the CCTS Registry specification is still embryonic
> (2) use of a mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM - can only be a
> recommendation
>
> I propose we [show how to] map all the selected e-GMS metdata subset  -
> (a) directly to ebRIM (farrukh)
> (b) to CCTS (carl supported by Duane)
>
> comments ???
>
> carl
>
>
> <quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
> > Paul Spencer wrote:
> >
> >>Maewyn,
> >>
> >>One thing we need to do for the registry pilot is to look at how to map
> >> the
> >>metadata that will be stored in the registry. I have looked at what I
> >> think
> >>we need to support, both in the proof of concept and the longer
> term. The
> >>attached describes this just for the e-GMS metadata set. Farrukh will
> >> then
> >>look at mapping this to the Registry Information Model.
> >>
> >>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > As I understand it the document you posted identifies the subset of
> > e-GMS data for us to focus on within the POC.
> > Thanks for getting this step done. The mapping step requires us to
> > decide between:
> >
> > a) mapping directly to ebRIM (probably ClassificationScheme) or
> >
> > b) mapping to CCTS and then using CCRIM to map to ebRIM
> >
> > As I understand based upon our email discussion, Carl is in favor of
> > (b), you maybe in favor of (a), I am unsure yet but leaning towards (b)
> > and we are waiting on Duane to weigh in on the mapping decision.
> >
> > If we do (a) then I volunteer to map to ebRIM
> > If we do (b) then I believe Carl has volunteered to do mapping to CCTS.
> >
> > Can we get closure on the choice between mapping approach (a) and (b) in
> > this thread?
> >
> > I can provie a sample direct ebRIM mapping for one term (say Audience)
> > by tomorrow if it helps people decide between (a) and (b). Carl could
> > you do same for mapping Audience to CCTS? Does this tactical step make
> > sense?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Farrukh
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carl Mattocks
>
> co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
> co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC
> CEO CHECKMi
> v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
> www.CHECKMi.com
> Semantically Smart Compendiums
> (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi